← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
81 turbometrics.io
10 Sep 2026 7:00 PM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. -13
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 94
12 Sep 2026 10:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 19:00 81
356 ms
FCP
567 ms
LCP
970 ms
985 ms
Finished
356 ms
567 ms
970 ms
985 ms
Scan B 10:00 94
192 ms
FCP
313 ms
LCP
793 ms
808 ms
Finished
FCP
280 ms vs. 172 ms +108 ms
LCP
280 ms vs. 172 ms +108 ms
Finished
985 ms vs. 808 ms +177 ms
Score
81 vs. 94 -13

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 81 -13 94
Speed 60 -32 92
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 1.848 ms +1.344 ms 504 ms
FCP i 280 ms +108 ms 172 ms
LCP i 280 ms +108 ms 172 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 10 ms ≈ 0 7 ms
TCP connection 19 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 159 ms +48 ms 111 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 316 ms +120 ms 196 ms
Page loaded 341 ms +144 ms 197 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms ≈ 0 11 ms
TCP connection 18 ms ≈ 0 13 ms
TTFB 129 ms +34 ms 95 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 267 ms +92 ms 175 ms
Page loaded 284 ms +107 ms 177 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1848 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 504 ms.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−40 pts Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 1848 ms) —
— Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 504 ms) −8 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts