← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
13 Sep 2026 4:00 PM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +17
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 77
28 Aug 2026 4:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 16:00 94
232 ms
FCP
342 ms
LCP
834 ms
853 ms
Finished
232 ms
342 ms
834 ms
853 ms
Scan B 04:00 77
13.0 s
FCP
13.1 s
LCP
13.6 s
Finished
FCP
236 ms vs. 1.796 ms -1.560 ms
LCP
236 ms vs. 1.796 ms -1.560 ms
Finished
853 ms vs. 13.591 ms -12.738 ms
Score
94 vs. 77 +17

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +17 77
Speed 92 +38 54
Images 93 +7 86
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 549 ms -12.326 ms 12.875 ms
FCP i 236 ms -1.560 ms 1.796 ms
LCP i 236 ms -1.560 ms 1.796 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 7
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 46,8 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 9 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 24 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 140 ms -12.757 ms 12.897 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
DOM loaded 238 ms -12.739 ms 12.977 ms
Page loaded 241 ms -12.738 ms 12.979 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 21 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
TCP connection 15 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 163 ms -1.555 ms 1.718 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 233 ms -1.555 ms 1.788 ms
Page loaded 242 ms -1.557 ms 1.799 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 549 ms.

Resolved since scan B (2)

First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 1796 ms.
Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 12875 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 549 ms) —
— Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 12875 ms) −40 pts
— Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 1796 ms) −6 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −6 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −8 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts