Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
14 Sep 2026 10:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
vs. +9
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 85
16 Sep 2026 4:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 10:00 94
352 ms
FCP
566 ms
LCP
953 ms
983 ms
Finished
352 ms
566 ms
953 ms
983 ms
Scan B 04:00 85
228 ms
FCP
340 ms
LCP
828 ms
831 ms
Finished
FCP
304 ms vs. 204 ms +100 ms
LCP
304 ms vs. 204 ms +100 ms
Finished
983 ms vs. 831 ms +152 ms
Score
94 vs. 85 +9

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +9 85
Speed 92 +22 70
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 631 ms -680 ms 1.311 ms
FCP i 304 ms +100 ms 204 ms
LCP i 304 ms +100 ms 204 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 6 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
TCP connection 19 ms -33 ms 52 ms
TTFB 141 ms ≈ 0 150 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 312 ms +98 ms 214 ms
Page loaded 337 ms +108 ms 229 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 12 ms ≈ 0 7 ms
TCP connection 16 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 134 ms ≈ 0 125 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 268 ms +75 ms 193 ms
Page loaded 291 ms +85 ms 206 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 631 ms.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1311 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 631 ms)
High TTFB (Server response approx. 1311 ms) −30 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts