← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
15 Sep 2026 1:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +9
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 85
13 Sep 2026 10:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 01:00 94
228 ms
FCP
350 ms
LCP
829 ms
844 ms
Finished
228 ms
350 ms
829 ms
844 ms
Scan B 10:00 85
648 ms
FCP
749 ms
LCP
1.2 s
1.3 s
Finished
FCP
188 ms vs. 164 ms +24 ms
LCP
188 ms vs. 164 ms +24 ms
Finished
844 ms vs. 1.273 ms -429 ms
Score
94 vs. 85 +9

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +9 85
Speed 92 +22 70
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 555 ms -992 ms 1.547 ms
FCP i 188 ms ≈ 0 164 ms
LCP i 188 ms ≈ 0 164 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 5 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 114 ms -444 ms 558 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 224 ms -429 ms 653 ms
Page loaded 226 ms -428 ms 654 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms ≈ 0 8 ms
TCP connection 19 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 116 ms +23 ms 93 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 3 ms
DOM loaded 180 ms ≈ 0 172 ms
Page loaded 190 ms ≈ 0 173 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 555 ms.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1547 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 555 ms) —
— High TTFB (Server response approx. 1547 ms) −30 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts