projekt-aicom.de/

30 Sep 2026 7:46 PM Falkenstein

77/100

Good
Compare
Share & export

Guest scans are always publicly visible.

Export

Export JSON

Get notified when this page gets slower

Register for free – monitoring, alerts and more.

Start for free now →

How the page loads

FCP · 184 ms
184 ms FCP
LCP · 401 ms
401 ms LCP
Finished · 942 ms
942 ms Finished
View screenshot
Screenshot https://projekt-aicom.de/

Overview

Assessment

The website is fundamentally solid. Targeted improvements can raise the score further.

Speed
70 Needs improvement
Images
86 Good
Caching
–
WordPress
100 Excellent
Technical
66 Needs improvement

Google PageSpeed · Mobile 28 · Desktop 34

Browser runtime measurement

These values come from the real page build in the browser and show the differences between desktop and mobile.

Metric Desktop (1440 px) Mobile (390 px)
Requests 11 11
FCP i 184 ms 148 ms
LCP i 2136 ms 2132 ms
CLS i 0 0
TBT i 1423 ms 5 long tasks 1403 ms 5 long tasks

Google PageSpeed score

Synthetic measurement from Google Lighthouse — measured independently of the turbometrics score.

Mobile
28
Google PSI
Desktop
34
Google PSI

Google rates this page as slow — action needed. · Fetched on 30 Sep 2026 7:47 PM

Act now4

Critical

High TBT

Total Blocking Time approx. 1403 ms

One runtime request is very large

https://projekt-aicom.de/ – 2.69 MB

Host: projekt-aicom.de

https://projekt-aicom.de/

H1 missing

No H1 detected

Viewport missing

No viewport meta tag

Likely LCP text block

Mobile · Text / CSS block

The largest visible content appears to be text- or CSS-based and is more likely influenced by server response, CSS or fonts.

No direct image asset was detected for this LCP element. The visible main content here is probably text- or CSS-based.

Element type
P
Host
None
Size
–
Element size
350 × 245 px
Show technical details
Text excerpt: AICOM ist ein Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprojekt der WeichertMehner Unternehmensberatung für Kommunikation und der TU Dresden. Wir entwickeln einen KI-Assistenten, der Sprachmodel

Main causes

Actually loaded in the browser.

Mobile vs. desktop: LCP -4 ms Requests 0

Top hosts by data volume

projekt-aicom.de 2.756,5 KB · 2 req.

Largest requests

DOCUMENT https://projekt-aicom.de/ projekt-aicom.de 2.756,1 KB
OTHER favicon.ico projekt-aicom.de 0,4 KB
Resource breakdown – Mobile
JS
0,0 KB (0%)
CSS
0,0 KB (0%)
Images
0,0 KB (0%)
Fonts
0,0 KB (0%)
Video
0,0 KB (0%)

Total: 0,4 KB

Resource breakdown – Desktop
JS
0,0 KB (0%)
CSS
0,0 KB (0%)
Images
0,0 KB (0%)
Fonts
0,0 KB (0%)
Video
0,0 KB (0%)

Total: 0,4 KB

Recommendations

Important

Do some fine tuning

The basics are in order. It pays off to work through the smaller bottlenecks from the report.

The main thread is noticeably blocked

The browser main thread was blocked for around 1403 ms during page load (Total Blocking Time).

Recommendation: Reduce JavaScript load, defer heavy scripts and break up long tasks.

4 scripts without async/defer

4 JavaScript files are loaded synchronously and block page rendering.

Recommendation: Load scripts with an async or defer attribute wherever possible.

6 images without width/height

6 of 6 images have no explicit dimensions and can cause layout shifts (CLS).

Recommendation: Set width and height attributes on img tags.

No modern image formats

No WebP/AVIF detected

No clear lazy loading

No lazy loading indicators found

Explained simply

These short texts put the most important measurements into plain language.

Server response (TTFB)

Good

The server responds quickly.

Why it matters: TTFB stands for “time to first byte” — the time until the server returns the first data.

Technical value: 63 ms

Compression

Good

The page is served compressed, so less data has to be transferred.

Why it matters: Compression reduces the transfer size of HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Technical value: Content-Encoding: br (Brotli)

Browser caching

Good

The browser is allowed to cache files, which can make repeat visits faster.

Why it matters: Browser caching prevents unchanged files from being downloaded over and over again.

Technical value: CSS: unknown, JS: unknown, images: unknown, fonts: unknown | page cache: no, CDN: none detected, origin: LiteSpeed | HTML Cache-Control: empty (normal for dynamic pages)

Images

Watch

8 images were detected. Of those, 0 use lazy loading and 0 use modern formats such as WebP or AVIF.

Why it matters: Images are often the biggest performance factor. Lazy loading and modern formats help the most.

Technical value: no detailed types detected, measured image weight: 0 B

JavaScript

Good

0 external JavaScript files were detected in the delivered HTML. Further scripts may only be loaded during the real page load through optimisation or lazy-load mechanisms.

Why it matters: Many or large JavaScript files can delay a page’s rendering and interactivity.

Technical value: 0 external files, 0 data URI scripts, 0 B

Fonts

Good

No clear web font files were detected.

Why it matters: Many or large web fonts increase loading time and can cause visible layout delays.

Technical value: 0 font files, 0 external font services, groups: no grouped fonts detected, measured font weight: 0 B

CSS

Good

0 direct CSS files and 0 additional CSS dependencies were detected.

Why it matters: Many stylesheets or imported CSS files increase the number of loaded resources.

Technical value: Direct CSS files: 0, additional dependencies: 0, estimated CSS weight: 0 B

External services

Good

No external services were detected – good for loading time and privacy.

Why it matters: Every additional external domain increases dependencies and can affect loading time.

Technical value: 0 external hosts

Visible page rendering

Good

The first visible content appears after around 148 ms, the most important visible content after around 2132 ms. That is still in the green range, but there is room for improvement.

Why it matters: These values describe when users actually see the first and the most important content.

Technical value: FCP: 148 ms, LCP: 2132 ms

Layout stability

Good

Layout stability is good. The measured CLS value is 0.

Why it matters: CLS describes whether content shifts visibly while loading.

Technical value: CLS: 0

Real browser requests

Watch

The real page load issues relatively many requests: 11 requests with around 2.69 MB.

Why it matters: This value shows the actual runtime load in the browser, not just static HTML indicators.

Technical value: 11 requests, 2.69 MB

Deductions by category

Speed

−20 pts.
High TBT
Total Blocking Time approx. 1403 ms
−5 pts.
Elevated runtime weight
2.69 MB
−5 pts.
Blocking scripts
4 scripts without async/defer

Cache quality by asset type

CSS
Unknown
0/0 cacheable
JavaScript
Unknown
0/0 cacheable
Images
Unknown
0/0 cacheable
Fonts
Unknown
0/0 cacheable

More data

Largest requests during the real page build2

This list shows the largest requests from the real browser run and helps you spot notable files and hosts faster.

DOCUMENT projekt-aicom.de https://projekt-aicom.de/
2.756,1 KB
OTHER projekt-aicom.de https://projekt-aicom.de/favicon.ico
0,4 KB

Technical metrics

HTTP status
200
TTFB
63 ms
HTTPS
Yes
HTTP/2
Yes
HTTP/3
Yes
Compression
BR (Brotli)
Browser caching
No
IPv4
212.83.43.15
IPv6
2a00:f48:2000:5::15
Runtime requests
11
Checked assets
0
Final URL
https://projekt-aicom.de/

Measurement conditions

IP protocol
IPv4
Latency to site
115 ms
Reference latency
7 ms
Measured at
30 Sep 2026 7:47 PM

Connection timing (TTFB: 63 ms)

DNS 61 ms
TLS 2 ms
Transfer 47 ms
Total / 110 ms
Response, caching and delivery
Redirects
0
Content type
text/html
Page cache
No
CDN
None detected
Cache-Control
Not set
Origin server
LiteSpeed
HTML and page structure
HTML size
3.771,5 KB
DOM elements
646
JS files
0
Inline scripts
7
Images total
8
Lazy loading
0
WebP/AVIF
0 of 8 image files
Font files
0
External hosts
0
Scripts without async/defer
4
Images without dimensions
6
Iframes
0
Blocking scripts (4)
  • JS cbe4979f-e618-41db-8ed0-54d08bb09063
  • JS 0beb9199-e7fe-4424-b85a-7b6388b54247
  • JS a88354c6-f925-433c-960a-ecf4384a189a
  • JS 3bf49768-aa61-4ac3-94a9-5118d62f842d
Assets and weight
Fonts 0,0 KB
Images 0,0 KB
JS 0,0 KB
CSS dep 0,0 KB
CSS 0,0 KB

Note: only the measured sample could be used for images, not a measurement of the actual load process. The real image weight is probably higher than shown here.

Total weight
0,0 KB
Largest image
0,0 KB
Assets with query string
0
Uncacheable assets
0
CSS and external script sources
CSS dependencies
0
CSS dependency weight
0,0 KB
Fonts from CSS
0
Images from CSS
0
External hosts from CSS
0
External script hosts
0
Page build timing
Long tasks

Tasks that blocked the browser main thread.

  • 264 ms→752 ms blocked|vermutlich Script-/Rendering-Arbeit
  • 1.087 ms→14 ms blocked|vermutlich Script-/Rendering-Arbeit
  • 1.320 ms→516 ms blocked|vermutlich Script-/Rendering-Arbeit
  • 1.890 ms→108 ms blocked|vermutlich Script-/Rendering-Arbeit
  • 2.048 ms→13 ms blocked|vermutlich Script-/Rendering-Arbeit

Details on individual metrics

In-depth values for assets, images, fonts, CSS and JavaScript. The most important groups are grouped thematically below.

Images in detail
Fonts and CSS in detail

WordPress detection

WordPress detected
No
Signal strength
Theme
–
Builder
–
Generator meta
Not set
WP-JSON link
No

Optimisation potential3

Watch

These points are not critical, but can improve the performance, stability or clarity of the page structure.

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable

Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.

Recommendation: Enable lazy loading for images outside the viewport.

No modern image formats detected

No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Recommendation: Use WebP or AVIF for images where possible.

Basic technical signals are incomplete

Title: yes, H1: no, Viewport: no.

Recommendation: Complete the basic HTML and SEO information.

Already done well6

Good

These points already stood out positively in the current scan.

Server responds quickly

The server response takes around 63 ms.

Compression is active

Detected compression: br.

HTTPS is active

The website is reachable over HTTPS.

Show more positive points (3)

HTTP/2 is active

The website is served over HTTP/2.

HTTP/3 is supported

The website advertises HTTP/3 via the Alt-Svc header.

IPv6 is supported

The website is reachable over IPv6.

Additional hints1

Note

Supplementary hints from the scan that can be useful for classification and technical assessment.

WordPress not clearly detected

No clear WordPress indicators were found in the HTML or the asset paths.

Waterfall

Detailed request waterfall from the browser run.

Raw data

Complete scan data as a machine-readable JSON file or tabular export.

More export formats & API access

PDF, Excel, CSV and full API access are available on paid plans.

View plans →

Personalised AI recommendations

Scan your website and get an AI analysis with concrete measures – free with an account.

Register for free →
  • Unlimited analyses · Every scan, any time
  • Prioritised findings · What really matters
  • AI analysis · individual & automatic