Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
21:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
360 ms
vs.
212 ms
+148 ms
LCP
360 ms
vs.
212 ms
+148 ms
Finished
1.01 s
vs.
839 ms
+167 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 581 ms Needs improvement | ≈ 0 | 567 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 372 ms Good | +168 ms | 204 ms Good |
| LCP i | 372 ms Good | +168 ms | 204 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 34 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 150 ms | +43 ms | 107 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 330 ms | +115 ms | 215 ms |
| Page loaded | 353 ms | +133 ms | 220 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 30 ms | +21 ms | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 158 ms | +50 ms | 108 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 322 ms | +108 ms | 214 ms |
| Page loaded | 341 ms | +123 ms | 218 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 581 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 581 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |