Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
21:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
212 ms
vs.
420 ms
−208 ms
LCP
212 ms
vs.
420 ms
−208 ms
Finished
839 ms
vs.
1.07 s
−233 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 567 ms Needs improvement | −63 ms | 630 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 204 ms Good | −212 ms | 416 ms Good |
| LCP i | 204 ms Good | −212 ms | 416 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 15 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TTFB | 107 ms | −28 ms | 135 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| DOM loaded | 215 ms | −187 ms | 402 ms |
| Page loaded | 220 ms | −300 ms | 520 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 21 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 108 ms | −60 ms | 168 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 214 ms | −199 ms | 413 ms |
| Page loaded | 218 ms | −232 ms | 450 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 567 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 567 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |