Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
06:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
448 ms
vs.
232 ms
+216 ms
LCP
448 ms
vs.
232 ms
+216 ms
Finished
1.09 s
vs.
842 ms
+246 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 514 ms Needs improvement | +104 ms | 410 ms Good |
| FCP i | 316 ms Good | +112 ms | 204 ms Good |
| LCP i | 316 ms Good | +112 ms | 204 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 51.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 124 ms | ≈ 0 | 115 ms |
| Transfer | 10 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 369 ms | +137 ms | 232 ms |
| Page loaded | 412 ms | +178 ms | 234 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 25 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 137 ms | +31 ms | 106 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 276 ms | +81 ms | 195 ms |
| Page loaded | 292 ms | +84 ms | 208 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 514 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 514 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |