Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
09:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
18:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
404 ms
vs.
388 ms
+16 ms
LCP
404 ms
vs.
388 ms
+16 ms
Finished
1.01 s
vs.
1.01 s
+8 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 63 ms Good | −736 ms | 799 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 316 ms Good | −96 ms | 412 ms Good |
| LCP i | 316 ms Good | −96 ms | 412 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 28 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | — | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TTFB | 150 ms | ≈ 0 | 161 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 338 ms | ≈ 0 | 341 ms |
| Page loaded | 377 ms | ≈ 0 | 363 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 143 ms | ≈ 0 | 147 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 293 ms | −64 ms | 357 ms |
| Page loaded | 313 ms | −51 ms | 364 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 799 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 799 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |