Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
18:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
312 ms
vs.
388 ms
−76 ms
LCP
312 ms
vs.
388 ms
−76 ms
Finished
930 ms
vs.
1.01 s
−76 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 365 ms Good | −434 ms | 799 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 236 ms Good | −176 ms | 412 ms Good |
| LCP i | 236 ms Good | −176 ms | 412 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 28 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.3 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 43 ms | +43 ms | — |
| TCP connection | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TTFB | 174 ms | ≈ 0 | 161 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 314 ms | −27 ms | 341 ms |
| Page loaded | 315 ms | −48 ms | 363 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 11 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 131 ms | ≈ 0 | 147 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 226 ms | −131 ms | 357 ms |
| Page loaded | 239 ms | −125 ms | 364 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 799 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 799 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |