Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
21:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
308 ms
vs.
340 ms
−32 ms
LCP
308 ms
vs.
340 ms
−32 ms
Finished
957 ms
vs.
1.03 s
−69 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 794 ms Needs improvement | +615 ms | 179 ms Good |
| FCP i | 188 ms Good | −160 ms | 348 ms Good |
| LCP i | 188 ms Good | −160 ms | 348 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 51.0 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TCP connection | 22 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 201 ms | +24 ms | 177 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 312 ms | ≈ 0 | 325 ms |
| Page loaded | 314 ms | ≈ 0 | 330 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TCP connection | 21 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 102 ms | −77 ms | 179 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 194 ms | −159 ms | 353 ms |
| Page loaded | 195 ms | −160 ms | 355 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 794 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 794 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |