Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
06:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
880 ms
vs.
344 ms
+536 ms
LCP
880 ms
vs.
344 ms
+536 ms
Finished
1.50 s
vs.
927 ms
+568 ms
Score
97
vs.
97
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | 0 | 97 |
| Speed | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 295 ms Good | +213 ms | 82 ms Good |
| FCP i | 248 ms Good | −60 ms | 308 ms Good |
| LCP i | 248 ms Good | −60 ms | 308 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 670 ms | +561 ms | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 880 ms | +601 ms | 279 ms |
| Page loaded | 881 ms | +568 ms | 313 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TTFB | 138 ms | +27 ms | 111 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 249 ms | ≈ 0 | 266 ms |
| Page loaded | 250 ms | −35 ms | 285 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |