Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
06:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
240 ms
vs.
344 ms
−104 ms
LCP
240 ms
vs.
344 ms
−104 ms
Finished
865 ms
vs.
927 ms
−62 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 589 ms Needs improvement | +507 ms | 82 ms Good |
| FCP i | 208 ms Good | −100 ms | 308 ms Good |
| LCP i | 208 ms Good | −100 ms | 308 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 124 ms | ≈ 0 | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 228 ms | −51 ms | 279 ms |
| Page loaded | 243 ms | −70 ms | 313 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 23 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TTFB | 111 ms | ≈ 0 | 111 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 194 ms | −72 ms | 266 ms |
| Page loaded | 206 ms | −79 ms | 285 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 589 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 589 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |