Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
09:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
03:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
196 ms
vs.
224 ms
−28 ms
LCP
196 ms
vs.
224 ms
−28 ms
Finished
815 ms
vs.
856 ms
−41 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 93 ms Good | −513 ms | 606 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 684 ms Good | +504 ms | 180 ms Good |
| LCP i | 684 ms Good | +504 ms | 180 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 103 ms | ≈ 0 | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 194 ms | −34 ms | 228 ms |
| Page loaded | 195 ms | −34 ms | 229 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 12 ms |
| TTFB | 599 ms | +502 ms | 97 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 674 ms | +482 ms | 192 ms |
| Page loaded | 687 ms | +493 ms | 194 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 606 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 606 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |