Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
228 ms
vs.
456 ms
−228 ms
LCP
228 ms
vs.
456 ms
−228 ms
Finished
845 ms
vs.
1.03 s
−188 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 719 ms Needs improvement | +57 ms | 662 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 164 ms Good | −448 ms | 612 ms Good |
| LCP i | 164 ms Good | −448 ms | 612 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 31 ms |
| TTFB | 130 ms | −68 ms | 198 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 228 ms | −134 ms | 362 ms |
| Page loaded | 229 ms | −148 ms | 377 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TTFB | 90 ms | −325 ms | 415 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 157 ms | −463 ms | 620 ms |
| Page loaded | 168 ms | −457 ms | 625 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 719 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 719 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |