Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
15:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
368 ms
vs.
456 ms
−88 ms
LCP
368 ms
vs.
456 ms
−88 ms
Finished
996 ms
vs.
1.03 s
−37 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 236 ms Good | −426 ms | 662 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 292 ms Good | −320 ms | 612 ms Good |
| LCP i | 292 ms Good | −320 ms | 612 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 22 ms | ≈ 0 | 31 ms |
| TTFB | 132 ms | −66 ms | 198 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 330 ms | −32 ms | 362 ms |
| Page loaded | 363 ms | ≈ 0 | 377 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 27 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TTFB | 120 ms | −295 ms | 415 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 255 ms | −365 ms | 620 ms |
| Page loaded | 279 ms | −346 ms | 625 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 662 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 662 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |