Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
15:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
15:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
368 ms
vs.
384 ms
−16 ms
LCP
368 ms
vs.
384 ms
−16 ms
Finished
996 ms
vs.
1.01 s
−13 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 236 ms Good | −409 ms | 645 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 292 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 328 ms Good |
| LCP i | 292 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 328 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 22 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TTFB | 132 ms | −41 ms | 173 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 330 ms | −29 ms | 359 ms |
| Page loaded | 363 ms | −24 ms | 387 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 27 ms | ≈ 0 | 22 ms |
| TTFB | 120 ms | −33 ms | 153 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 255 ms | −56 ms | 311 ms |
| Page loaded | 279 ms | −53 ms | 332 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 645 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 645 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |