Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
03:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
09:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
900 ms
vs.
332 ms
+568 ms
LCP
900 ms
vs.
332 ms
+568 ms
Finished
1.53 s
vs.
970 ms
+557 ms
Score
97
vs.
97
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | 0 | 97 |
| Speed | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 227 ms Good | +130 ms | 97 ms Good |
| FCP i | 312 ms Good | +60 ms | 252 ms Good |
| LCP i | 312 ms Good | +60 ms | 252 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 5 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 25 ms |
| TTFB | 687 ms | +543 ms | 144 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 846 ms | +550 ms | 296 ms |
| Page loaded | 880 ms | +556 ms | 324 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | — | ≈ 0 | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 125 ms | +24 ms | 101 ms |
| Transfer | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 278 ms | +40 ms | 238 ms |
| Page loaded | 300 ms | +43 ms | 257 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |