Scan comparison

Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
8 Oct 2026 9:00 PM · Falkenstein
vs. +9
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 85
9 Oct 2026 12:00 AM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 21:00 94
412 ms
FCP
599 ms
LCP
969 ms
Finished
320 ms
504 ms
921 ms
992 ms
Scan B 00:00 85
320 ms
FCP
504 ms
LCP
921 ms
992 ms
Finished
FCP
412 ms vs. 320 ms +92 ms
LCP
412 ms vs. 320 ms +92 ms
Finished
969 ms vs. 992 ms −23 ms
Score
94 vs. 85 +9

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +9 85
Speed 92 +22 70
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 613 ms Good −789 ms 1.4 s Needs improvement
FCP i 536 ms Good +244 ms 292 ms Good
LCP i 536 ms Good +244 ms 292 ms Good
CLS i 0 Good ≈ 0 0 Good
TBT i 0 ms Good ≈ 0 0 ms Good
Requests i 6 Good ≈ 0 6 Good
Data volume i 47.4 KB ≈ 0 47.4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 13 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
TCP connection 15 ms ≈ 0 20 ms
TTFB 127 ms ≈ 0 113 ms
Transfer 5 ms ≈ 0 3 ms
DOM loaded 313 ms +21 ms 292 ms
Page loaded 336 ms ≈ 0 324 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 9 ms ≈ 0 20 ms
TCP connection 26 ms ≈ 0 18 ms
TTFB 323 ms +176 ms 147 ms
Transfer 5 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 515 ms +236 ms 279 ms
Page loaded 548 ms +249 ms 299 ms

Comparison of problems

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).

Only in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 613 ms.

Only in scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1.4 s. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 613 ms) —
— High TTFB (Server response approx. 1.4 s) −30 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts