Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
-12
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
00:00
85
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
03:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
320 ms
vs.
652 ms
−332 ms
LCP
320 ms
vs.
652 ms
−332 ms
Finished
992 ms
vs.
1.29 s
−296 ms
Score
85
vs.
97
-12
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 85 | -12 | 97 |
| Speed | 70 | -30 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 1.4 s Needs improvement | +1.09 s | 311 ms Good |
| FCP i | 292 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 264 ms Good |
| LCP i | 292 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 264 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 113 ms | −329 ms | 442 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 292 ms | −295 ms | 587 ms |
| Page loaded | 324 ms | −290 ms | 614 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 147 ms | +38 ms | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 279 ms | +23 ms | 256 ms |
| Page loaded | 299 ms | +23 ms | 276 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan A (1)
Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1.4 s. That slows down page rendering very early on.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −30 pts | High TTFB (Server response approx. 1.4 s) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |