Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+7
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
15:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
18:00
90
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
636 ms
vs.
340 ms
+296 ms
LCP
636 ms
vs.
340 ms
+296 ms
Finished
1.27 s
vs.
1 s
+270 ms
Score
97
vs.
90
+7
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +7 | 90 |
| Speed | 100 | +18 | 82 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 92 ms Good | −872 ms | 964 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 316 ms Good | +108 ms | 208 ms Good |
| LCP i | 316 ms Good | +108 ms | 208 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 273 ms | +263 ms | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 19 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 424 ms | +250 ms | 174 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 579 ms | +240 ms | 339 ms |
| Page loaded | 610 ms | +268 ms | 342 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 12 ms |
| TTFB | 144 ms | +35 ms | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 301 ms | +104 ms | 197 ms |
| Page loaded | 516 ms | +308 ms | 208 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 964 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 964 ms) | −18 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |