Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
09:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
732 ms
vs.
336 ms
+396 ms
LCP
732 ms
vs.
336 ms
+396 ms
Finished
1.38 s
vs.
997 ms
+387 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 357 ms Good | −261 ms | 618 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 212 ms Good | −80 ms | 292 ms Good |
| LCP i | 212 ms Good | −80 ms | 292 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 630 ms | +472 ms | 158 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 739 ms | +433 ms | 306 ms |
| Page loaded | 743 ms | +420 ms | 323 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 137 ms | ≈ 0 | 119 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 210 ms | −58 ms | 268 ms |
| Page loaded | 220 ms | −69 ms | 289 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 618 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 618 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |