Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
15:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
356 ms
vs.
740 ms
−384 ms
LCP
356 ms
vs.
740 ms
−384 ms
Finished
994 ms
vs.
1.41 s
−412 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 329 ms Good | −264 ms | 593 ms Good |
| FCP i | 364 ms Good | +68 ms | 296 ms Good |
| LCP i | 364 ms Good | +68 ms | 296 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | — | −26 ms | 26 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 128 ms | −463 ms | 591 ms |
| Transfer | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 314 ms | −422 ms | 736 ms |
| Page loaded | 335 ms | −407 ms | 742 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 23 ms |
| TTFB | 217 ms | +34 ms | 183 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 349 ms | +62 ms | 287 ms |
| Page loaded | 371 ms | +74 ms | 297 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 593 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 593 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |