← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
14 Oct 2026 1:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +9
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 85
12 Oct 2026 1:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 01:00 94
304 ms
FCP
487 ms
LCP
861 ms
Finished
268 ms
443 ms
870 ms
898 ms
Scan B 01:00 85
268 ms
FCP
443 ms
LCP
870 ms
898 ms
Finished
FCP
260 ms vs. 260 ms ±0
LCP
260 ms vs. 260 ms ±0
Finished
861 ms vs. 898 ms -37 ms
Score
94 vs. 85 +9

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +9 85
Speed 92 +22 70
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 590 ms -915 ms 1.505 ms
FCP i 260 ms ≈ 0 260 ms
LCP i 260 ms ≈ 0 260 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 2 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 24 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 94 ms ≈ 0 96 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 7 ms
DOM loaded 230 ms ≈ 0 239 ms
Page loaded 260 ms ≈ 0 269 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 3 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 19 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 109 ms ≈ 0 92 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
DOM loaded 270 ms +23 ms 247 ms
Page loaded 274 ms ≈ 0 264 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 590 ms.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1505 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 590 ms) —
— High TTFB (Server response approx. 1505 ms) −30 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts