← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
14 Oct 2026 4:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +9
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 85
12 Oct 2026 1:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 04:00 94
216 ms
FCP
316 ms
LCP
616 ms
837 ms
Finished
216 ms
316 ms
616 ms
837 ms
Scan B 01:00 85
268 ms
FCP
443 ms
LCP
870 ms
898 ms
Finished
FCP
224 ms vs. 260 ms -36 ms
LCP
224 ms vs. 260 ms -36 ms
Finished
837 ms vs. 898 ms -61 ms
Score
94 vs. 85 +9

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +9 85
Speed 92 +22 70
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 609 ms -896 ms 1.505 ms
FCP i 224 ms ≈ 0 260 ms
LCP i 224 ms ≈ 0 260 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 9 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 13 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 104 ms ≈ 0 96 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 7 ms
DOM loaded 216 ms -23 ms 239 ms
Page loaded 218 ms -51 ms 269 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 12 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 125 ms +33 ms 92 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
DOM loaded 176 ms -71 ms 247 ms
Page loaded 214 ms -50 ms 264 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 609 ms.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 1505 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 609 ms) —
— High TTFB (Server response approx. 1505 ms) −30 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts