Scan comparison

Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
14 Oct 2026 6:00 AM · Falkenstein
vs. +13
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 81
12 Oct 2026 6:00 AM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 06:00 94
216 ms
FCP
316 ms
LCP
616 ms
837 ms
Finished
216 ms
316 ms
616 ms
837 ms
Scan B 06:00 81
316 ms
FCP
533 ms
LCP
918 ms
954 ms
Finished
FCP
216 ms vs. 316 ms −100 ms
LCP
216 ms vs. 316 ms −100 ms
Finished
837 ms vs. 954 ms −117 ms
Score
94 vs. 81 +13

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +13 81
Speed 92 +32 60
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 609 ms Good −1.55 s 2.15 s Poor
FCP i 224 ms Good −80 ms 304 ms Good
LCP i 224 ms Good −80 ms 304 ms Good
CLS i 0 Good ≈ 0 0 Good
TBT i 0 ms Good ≈ 0 6 ms Good
Requests i 6 Good ≈ 0 6 Good
Data volume i 47.4 KB ≈ 0 47.4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 9 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
TCP connection 13 ms ≈ 0 17 ms
TTFB 104 ms −24 ms 128 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 216 ms −56 ms 272 ms
Page loaded 218 ms −87 ms 305 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 12 ms ≈ 0 18 ms
TTFB 125 ms ≈ 0 112 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
DOM loaded 176 ms −93 ms 269 ms
Page loaded 214 ms −63 ms 277 ms

Comparison of problems

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).

New problems in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 609 ms.

Fixed since scan B (1)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 2.15 s. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 609 ms) —
— Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 2.15 s) −40 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts