Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
97 turbometrics.io
14 Oct 2026 10:00 AM · Falkenstein
vs. 0
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 97
12 Oct 2026 4:00 PM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 10:00 97
356 ms
526 ms
958 ms
994 ms
Scan B 16:00 97
356 ms
FCP
526 ms
LCP
958 ms
994 ms
Finished
FCP
272 ms vs. 364 ms -92 ms
LCP
272 ms vs. 364 ms -92 ms
Finished
- vs. 994 ms
Score
97 vs. 97 ±0

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 97 0 97
Speed 100 0 100
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 128 ms -201 ms 329 ms
FCP i 272 ms -92 ms 364 ms
LCP i 272 ms -92 ms 364 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — - —
TCP connection — - 17 ms
TTFB — - 128 ms
Transfer — - 6 ms
DOM loaded — - 314 ms
Page loaded — - 335 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — - 9 ms
TCP connection — - 20 ms
TTFB — - 217 ms
Transfer — - 2 ms
DOM loaded — - 349 ms
Page loaded — - 371 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Images
— No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
— No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
— Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
— No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts