Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
18:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
332 ms
vs.
332 ms
±0
LCP
332 ms
vs.
332 ms
±0
Finished
1 s
vs.
952 ms
+50 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 159 ms Good | −485 ms | 644 ms Good |
| FCP i | 244 ms Good | −52 ms | 296 ms Good |
| LCP i | 244 ms Good | −52 ms | 296 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 25 ms | +21 ms | 4 ms |
| TCP connection | 24 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 218 ms | +85 ms | 133 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 333 ms | +38 ms | 295 ms |
| Page loaded | 373 ms | +51 ms | 322 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 148 ms | ≈ 0 | 131 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 235 ms | −44 ms | 279 ms |
| Page loaded | 250 ms | −50 ms | 300 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 644 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 644 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |