← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
97 turbometrics.io
14 Oct 2026 4:00 PM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +7
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 90
14 Oct 2026 7:00 PM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 16:00 97
332 ms
FCP
445 ms
544 ms
LCP
931 ms
1.0 s
Finished
332 ms
445 ms
544 ms
931 ms
1.0 s
Scan B 19:00 90
412 ms
FCP
561 ms
LCP
1.0 s
1.0 s
Finished
FCP
244 ms vs. 1.716 ms -1.472 ms
LCP
244 ms vs. 1.716 ms -1.472 ms
Finished
1.002 ms vs. 1.016 ms -14 ms
Score
97 vs. 90 +7

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 97 +7 90
Speed 100 +14 86
Images 93 +7 86
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 159 ms -622 ms 781 ms
FCP i 244 ms -1.472 ms 1.716 ms
LCP i 244 ms -1.472 ms 1.716 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 25 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TCP connection 24 ms ≈ 0 17 ms
TTFB 218 ms +64 ms 154 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 333 ms ≈ 0 343 ms
Page loaded 373 ms +24 ms 349 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 16 ms ≈ 0 32 ms
TCP connection 18 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 148 ms -1.392 ms 1.540 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 3 ms
DOM loaded 235 ms -1.465 ms 1.700 ms
Page loaded 250 ms -1.473 ms 1.723 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

Resolved since scan B (3)

Mobile is noticeably slower than desktop
The mobile LCP is around 1304 ms above the desktop value.
First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 1716 ms.
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 781 ms.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
— Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 781 ms) −8 pts
— Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 1716 ms) −6 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −6 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −8 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts