Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
21:00
90
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
18:00
90
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
412 ms
vs.
340 ms
+72 ms
LCP
412 ms
vs.
340 ms
+72 ms
Finished
1.02 s
vs.
1 s
+15 ms
Score
90
vs.
90
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Speed | 86 | +4 | 82 |
| Images | 86 | -7 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 781 ms Good | −183 ms | 964 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 1.72 s Good | +1.51 s | 208 ms Good |
| LCP i | 1.72 s Good | +1.51 s | 208 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 154 ms | ≈ 0 | 174 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 343 ms | ≈ 0 | 339 ms |
| Page loaded | 349 ms | ≈ 0 | 342 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 32 ms | +22 ms | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 12 ms |
| TTFB | 1.54 s | +1.43 s | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 1.7 s | +1.5 s | 197 ms |
| Page loaded | 1.72 s | +1.52 s | 208 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
New problems in scan A (2)
Mobile is noticeably slower than desktop
The mobile LCP is around 1.3 s above the desktop value.
First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 1.72 s.
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 781 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 781 ms) | — |
| −6 pts | Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 1.72 s) | — |
| — | Elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 964 ms) | −18 pts |
| Images | ||
| −6 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −8 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |