Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
15 Oct 2026 12:00 AM
· Falkenstein
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
15:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
356 ms
vs.
636 ms
−280 ms
LCP
356 ms
vs.
636 ms
−280 ms
Finished
987 ms
vs.
1.27 s
−284 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 666 ms Good | +574 ms | 92 ms Good |
| FCP i | 268 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 316 ms Good |
| LCP i | 268 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 316 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | −268 ms | 273 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 136 ms | −288 ms | 424 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 306 ms | −273 ms | 579 ms |
| Page loaded | 334 ms | −276 ms | 610 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | — | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 10 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TTFB | 96 ms | −48 ms | 144 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 239 ms | −62 ms | 301 ms |
| Page loaded | 259 ms | −257 ms | 516 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
New problems in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 666 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 666 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |