Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
03:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
03:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
328 ms
vs.
652 ms
−324 ms
LCP
328 ms
vs.
652 ms
−324 ms
Finished
944 ms
vs.
1.29 s
−344 ms
Score
97
vs.
97
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | 0 | 97 |
| Speed | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 236 ms Good | −75 ms | 311 ms Good |
| FCP i | 288 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 264 ms Good |
| LCP i | 288 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 264 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 16 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 124 ms | −318 ms | 442 ms |
| Transfer | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 275 ms | −312 ms | 587 ms |
| Page loaded | 303 ms | −311 ms | 614 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| TCP connection | 22 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 107 ms | ≈ 0 | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 246 ms | ≈ 0 | 256 ms |
| Page loaded | 273 ms | ≈ 0 | 276 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |