Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
15 Oct 2026 12:00 PM
· Falkenstein
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
456 ms
vs.
292 ms
+164 ms
LCP
456 ms
vs.
292 ms
+164 ms
Finished
1.03 s
vs.
879 ms
+154 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 662 ms Needs improvement | −105 ms | 767 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 612 ms Good | +352 ms | 260 ms Good |
| LCP i | 612 ms Good | +352 ms | 260 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 31 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 198 ms | +95 ms | 103 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| DOM loaded | 362 ms | +124 ms | 238 ms |
| Page loaded | 377 ms | +108 ms | 269 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 415 ms | +327 ms | 88 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 620 ms | +401 ms | 219 ms |
| Page loaded | 625 ms | +387 ms | 238 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 662 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 662 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |