Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
15:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
06:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
384 ms
vs.
680 ms
−296 ms
LCP
384 ms
vs.
680 ms
−296 ms
Finished
1.01 s
vs.
1.30 s
−292 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 645 ms Needs improvement | +89 ms | 556 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 328 ms Good | +136 ms | 192 ms Good |
| LCP i | 328 ms Good | +136 ms | 192 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 173 ms | −419 ms | 592 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 359 ms | −325 ms | 684 ms |
| Page loaded | 387 ms | −299 ms | 686 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 22 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 153 ms | +59 ms | 94 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 311 ms | +115 ms | 196 ms |
| Page loaded | 332 ms | +135 ms | 197 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 645 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 645 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |