Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
16 Oct 2026 12:00 AM
· Falkenstein
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
09:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
340 ms
vs.
196 ms
+144 ms
LCP
340 ms
vs.
196 ms
+144 ms
Finished
976 ms
vs.
815 ms
+161 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 682 ms Needs improvement | +589 ms | 93 ms Good |
| FCP i | 316 ms Good | −368 ms | 684 ms Good |
| LCP i | 316 ms Good | −368 ms | 684 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 6 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | 7 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TTFB | 132 ms | +29 ms | 103 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 309 ms | +115 ms | 194 ms |
| Page loaded | 332 ms | +137 ms | 195 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 148 ms | −451 ms | 599 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 293 ms | −381 ms | 674 ms |
| Page loaded | 313 ms | −374 ms | 687 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
New findings in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 682 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 682 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |