Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
03:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
224 ms
vs.
400 ms
−176 ms
LCP
224 ms
vs.
400 ms
−176 ms
Finished
856 ms
vs.
982 ms
−126 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 606 ms Needs improvement | ≈ 0 | 646 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 180 ms Good | −136 ms | 316 ms Good |
| LCP i | 180 ms Good | −136 ms | 316 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 109 ms | −23 ms | 132 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 228 ms | −74 ms | 302 ms |
| Page loaded | 229 ms | −106 ms | 335 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 12 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 97 ms | −28 ms | 125 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 192 ms | −110 ms | 302 ms |
| Page loaded | 194 ms | −136 ms | 330 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 606 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 606 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |