Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+7
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
06:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
15:00
90
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
344 ms
vs.
780 ms
−436 ms
LCP
344 ms
vs.
780 ms
−436 ms
Finished
927 ms
vs.
1.41 s
−479 ms
Score
97
vs.
90
+7
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +7 | 90 |
| Speed | 100 | +18 | 82 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 82 ms Good | −801 ms | 883 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 308 ms Good | +124 ms | 184 ms Good |
| LCP i | 308 ms Good | +124 ms | 184 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 109 ms | −551 ms | 660 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 279 ms | −473 ms | 752 ms |
| Page loaded | 313 ms | −470 ms | 783 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TCP connection | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 111 ms | ≈ 0 | 98 ms |
| Transfer | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 266 ms | +77 ms | 189 ms |
| Page loaded | 285 ms | +85 ms | 200 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 883 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server responds a little slowly (Response after about 883 ms) | −18 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |