Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
09:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
21:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
248 ms
vs.
256 ms
−8 ms
LCP
248 ms
vs.
256 ms
−8 ms
Finished
868 ms
vs.
887 ms
−19 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 238 ms Good | −549 ms | 787 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 300 ms Good | +64 ms | 236 ms Good |
| LCP i | 300 ms Good | +64 ms | 236 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 10 ms |
| TCP connection | 12 ms | ≈ 0 | 19 ms |
| TTFB | 131 ms | −24 ms | 155 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 226 ms | −34 ms | 260 ms |
| Page loaded | 247 ms | ≈ 0 | 262 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 27 ms |
| TTFB | 142 ms | ≈ 0 | 146 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 306 ms | +82 ms | 224 ms |
| Page loaded | 308 ms | +70 ms | 238 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 787 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 787 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |