Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
16 Oct 2026 12:00 PM
· Falkenstein
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
392 ms
vs.
328 ms
+64 ms
LCP
392 ms
vs.
328 ms
+64 ms
Finished
981 ms
vs.
936 ms
+45 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 664 ms Needs improvement | +354 ms | 310 ms Good |
| FCP i | 328 ms Good | +100 ms | 228 ms Good |
| LCP i | 328 ms Good | +100 ms | 228 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 26 ms | +21 ms | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 24 ms | −32 ms | 56 ms |
| TTFB | 159 ms | −23 ms | 182 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 333 ms | +34 ms | 299 ms |
| Page loaded | 359 ms | +59 ms | 300 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 21 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 116 ms | ≈ 0 | 136 ms |
| Transfer | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 275 ms | +41 ms | 234 ms |
| Page loaded | 312 ms | +76 ms | 236 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
New findings in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 664 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 664 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |