Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
21:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
340 ms
vs.
240 ms
+100 ms
LCP
340 ms
vs.
240 ms
+100 ms
Finished
1.03 s
vs.
861 ms
+165 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 179 ms Good | −435 ms | 614 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 348 ms Good | +140 ms | 208 ms Good |
| LCP i | 348 ms Good | +140 ms | 208 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 51.0 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 16 ms |
| TTFB | 177 ms | +50 ms | 127 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 325 ms | +73 ms | 252 ms |
| Page loaded | 330 ms | +77 ms | 253 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TTFB | 179 ms | +70 ms | 109 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 353 ms | +143 ms | 210 ms |
| Page loaded | 355 ms | +143 ms | 212 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 614 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 614 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |