Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
97
turbometrics.io
17 Oct 2026 12:00 AM
· Falkenstein
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
00:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
232 ms
vs.
420 ms
−188 ms
LCP
232 ms
vs.
420 ms
−188 ms
Finished
842 ms
vs.
1.07 s
−230 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 410 ms Good | −220 ms | 630 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 204 ms Good | −212 ms | 416 ms Good |
| LCP i | 204 ms Good | −212 ms | 416 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 15 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 51.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TTFB | 115 ms | ≈ 0 | 135 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| DOM loaded | 232 ms | −170 ms | 402 ms |
| Page loaded | 234 ms | −286 ms | 520 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 7 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 106 ms | −62 ms | 168 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 195 ms | −218 ms | 413 ms |
| Page loaded | 208 ms | −242 ms | 450 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 630 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 630 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |