Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
03:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
336 ms
vs.
420 ms
−84 ms
LCP
336 ms
vs.
420 ms
−84 ms
Finished
950 ms
vs.
1.07 s
−122 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 631 ms Needs improvement | ≈ 0 | 630 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 244 ms Good | −172 ms | 416 ms Good |
| LCP i | 244 ms Good | −172 ms | 416 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 15 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 51.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | — |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TTFB | 113 ms | −22 ms | 135 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| DOM loaded | 283 ms | −119 ms | 402 ms |
| Page loaded | 310 ms | −210 ms | 520 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 104 ms | −64 ms | 168 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 248 ms | −165 ms | 413 ms |
| Page loaded | 258 ms | −192 ms | 450 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 631 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 631 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |