← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
19 Oct 2026 4:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. -1
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 95
21 Oct 2026 1:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 04:00 94
348 ms
FCP
489 ms
LCP
910 ms
Finished
348 ms
489 ms
910 ms
Scan B 01:00 95
276 ms
FCP
412 ms
LCP
863 ms
Finished
FCP
300 ms vs. 204 ms +96 ms
LCP
300 ms vs. 204 ms +96 ms
Finished
910 ms vs. 863 ms +47 ms
Score
94 vs. 95 -1

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 -1 95
Speed 92 0 92
Images 93 -4 97
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 511 ms -110 ms 621 ms
FCP i 300 ms +96 ms 204 ms
LCP i 300 ms +96 ms 204 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 3 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 -3 9
Data volume i 51,4 KB -79,3 KB 130,7 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 7 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 96 ms ≈ 0 93 ms
Transfer 4 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 265 ms +116 ms 149 ms
Page loaded 271 ms +31 ms 240 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 7 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
TCP connection 13 ms ≈ 0 15 ms
TTFB 89 ms ≈ 0 82 ms
Transfer 4 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 297 ms +120 ms 177 ms
Page loaded 304 ms +98 ms 206 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Resolved since scan B (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Unchanged (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 511 ms.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 511 ms) −8 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) —
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) —
— Several images (12 images) −3 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts