Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
20 Oct 2026 7:00 AM · Falkenstein
vs. -4
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 98
22 Oct 2026 1:00 AM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 07:00 94
468 ms
FCP
640 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
468 ms
640 ms
1.1 s
Scan B 01:00 98
360 ms
FCP
580 ms
LCP
915 ms
Finished
FCP
356 ms vs. 336 ms +20 ms
LCP
356 ms vs. 336 ms +20 ms
Finished
1.056 ms vs. 915 ms +141 ms
Score
94 vs. 98 -4

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 -4 98
Speed 92 -8 100
Images 93 -4 97
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 762 ms +693 ms 69 ms
FCP i 356 ms ≈ 0 336 ms
LCP i 356 ms ≈ 0 336 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 13 ms ≈ 0 22 ms
Requests i 6 -3 9
Data volume i 51,4 KB -81,0 KB 132,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 22 ms ≈ 0 15 ms
TTFB 181 ms +106 ms 75 ms
Transfer 4 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 397 ms +247 ms 150 ms
Page loaded 421 ms +143 ms 278 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 5 ms
TCP connection 10 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 161 ms +65 ms 96 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 360 ms +79 ms 281 ms
Page loaded 375 ms +70 ms 305 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (3)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 762 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Resolved since scan B (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 762 ms) —
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) —
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) —
— Several images (12 images) −3 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts