← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
20 Oct 2026 7:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. -1
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 95
22 Oct 2026 4:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 07:00 94
468 ms
FCP
640 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
468 ms
640 ms
1.1 s
Scan B 04:00 95
476 ms
FCP
656 ms
LCP
1.0 s
Finished
FCP
356 ms vs. 348 ms +8 ms
LCP
356 ms vs. 348 ms +8 ms
Finished
1.056 ms vs. 1.004 ms +52 ms
Score
94 vs. 95 -1

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 -1 95
Speed 92 0 92
Images 93 -4 97
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 762 ms +57 ms 705 ms
FCP i 356 ms ≈ 0 348 ms
LCP i 356 ms ≈ 0 348 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 13 ms -59 ms 72 ms
Requests i 6 -3 9
Data volume i 51,4 KB -81,0 KB 132,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 22 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 181 ms +114 ms 67 ms
Transfer 4 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
DOM loaded 397 ms +100 ms 297 ms
Page loaded 421 ms +93 ms 328 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 5 ms
TCP connection 10 ms ≈ 0 15 ms
TTFB 161 ms +84 ms 77 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
DOM loaded 360 ms +53 ms 307 ms
Page loaded 375 ms +38 ms 337 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Resolved since scan B (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Unchanged (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 762 ms.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 762 ms) −8 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) —
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) —
— Several images (12 images) −3 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts