Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
91 turbometrics.io
22 Oct 2026 10:00 AM · Falkenstein
vs. -3
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 94
20 Oct 2026 4:00 PM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 10:00 91
240 ms
FCP
399 ms
LCP
840 ms
965 ms
Finished
240 ms
399 ms
840 ms
965 ms
Scan B 16:00 94
260 ms
FCP
374 ms
LCP
860 ms
1.0 s
Finished
FCP
268 ms vs. 320 ms -52 ms
LCP
268 ms vs. 320 ms -52 ms
Finished
965 ms vs. 1.008 ms -43 ms
Score
91 vs. 94 -3

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 91 -3 94
Speed 82 -10 92
Images 97 +4 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 1.160 ms +577 ms 583 ms
FCP i 268 ms -52 ms 320 ms
LCP i 268 ms -52 ms 320 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 17 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 9 +3 6
Data volume i 134,5 KB +83,1 KB 51,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms -25 ms 33 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 19 ms
TTFB 87 ms -72 ms 159 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 226 ms -50 ms 276 ms
Page loaded 246 ms -36 ms 282 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 10 ms ≈ 0 11 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 28 ms
TTFB 86 ms -106 ms 192 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 233 ms -85 ms 318 ms
Page loaded 254 ms -74 ms 328 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Resolved since scan B (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Unchanged (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 1160 ms.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−18 pts Elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 1160 ms) —
— Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 583 ms) −8 pts
Images
−3 pts Several images (12 images) —
— No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
— No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts