← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
28 Aug 2026 1:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +17
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 77
28 Aug 2026 4:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 01:00 94
312 ms
FCP
521 ms
LCP
912 ms
918 ms
Finished
312 ms
521 ms
912 ms
918 ms
Scan B 04:00 77
13.0 s
FCP
13.1 s
LCP
13.6 s
Finished
FCP
240 ms vs. 1.796 ms -1.556 ms
LCP
240 ms vs. 1.796 ms -1.556 ms
Finished
918 ms vs. 13.591 ms -12.673 ms
Score
94 vs. 77 +17

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +17 77
Speed 92 +38 54
Images 93 +7 86
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 501 ms -12.374 ms 12.875 ms
FCP i 240 ms -1.556 ms 1.796 ms
LCP i 240 ms -1.556 ms 1.796 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 7 ≈ 0 7
Data volume i 46,7 KB ≈ 0 46,8 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 2 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
TCP connection 16 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 92 ms -12.805 ms 12.897 ms
Transfer 12 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
DOM loaded 284 ms -12.693 ms 12.977 ms
Page loaded 305 ms -12.674 ms 12.979 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 2 ms ≈ 0 6 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TTFB 92 ms -1.626 ms 1.718 ms
Transfer 5 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 231 ms -1.557 ms 1.788 ms
Page loaded 254 ms -1.545 ms 1.799 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 501 ms.

Resolved since scan B (2)

First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 1796 ms.
Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 12875 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 501 ms) —
— Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 12875 ms) −40 pts
— Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 1796 ms) −6 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −6 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −8 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts