Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
77 turbometrics.io
28 Aug 2026 4:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
vs. -17
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 94
28 Aug 2026 1:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 04:00 77
13.0 s
FCP
13.1 s
LCP
13.6 s
Finished
312 ms
521 ms
912 ms
918 ms
Scan B 01:00 94
312 ms
FCP
521 ms
LCP
912 ms
918 ms
Finished
FCP
1.796 ms vs. 240 ms +1.556 ms
LCP
1.796 ms vs. 240 ms +1.556 ms
Finished
13.591 ms vs. 918 ms +12.673 ms
Score
77 vs. 94 -17

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 77 -17 94
Speed 54 -38 92
Images 86 -7 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 12.875 ms +12.374 ms 501 ms
FCP i 1.796 ms +1.556 ms 240 ms
LCP i 1.796 ms +1.556 ms 240 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 7 ≈ 0 7
Data volume i 46,8 KB ≈ 0 46,7 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 4 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
TCP connection 12 ms ≈ 0 16 ms
TTFB 12.897 ms +12.805 ms 92 ms
Transfer 5 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
DOM loaded 12.977 ms +12.693 ms 284 ms
Page loaded 12.979 ms +12.674 ms 305 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 6 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
TCP connection 12 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 1.718 ms +1.626 ms 92 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 5 ms
DOM loaded 1.788 ms +1.557 ms 231 ms
Page loaded 1.799 ms +1.545 ms 254 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 1796 ms.
Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 12875 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Resolved since scan B (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 501 ms.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−40 pts Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 12875 ms)
−6 pts Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 1796 ms)
Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 501 ms) −8 pts
Images
−6 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
−8 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts