Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
21:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
21:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
212 ms
vs.
340 ms
−128 ms
LCP
212 ms
vs.
340 ms
−128 ms
Finished
839 ms
vs.
1.03 s
−187 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 567 ms Needs improvement | +388 ms | 179 ms Good |
| FCP i | 204 ms Good | −144 ms | 348 ms Good |
| LCP i | 204 ms Good | −144 ms | 348 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 51.0 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TCP connection | 20 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 107 ms | −70 ms | 177 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 215 ms | −110 ms | 325 ms |
| Page loaded | 220 ms | −110 ms | 330 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 9 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TCP connection | 21 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 108 ms | −71 ms | 179 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 214 ms | −139 ms | 353 ms |
| Page loaded | 218 ms | −137 ms | 355 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 567 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 567 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |