Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
21:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
21:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
340 ms
vs.
212 ms
+128 ms
LCP
340 ms
vs.
212 ms
+128 ms
Finished
1.03 s
vs.
839 ms
+187 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 179 ms Good | −388 ms | 567 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 348 ms Good | +144 ms | 204 ms Good |
| LCP i | 348 ms Good | +144 ms | 204 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 51.0 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 20 ms |
| TTFB | 177 ms | +70 ms | 107 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 325 ms | +110 ms | 215 ms |
| Page loaded | 330 ms | +110 ms | 220 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 9 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 179 ms | +71 ms | 108 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 353 ms | +139 ms | 214 ms |
| Page loaded | 355 ms | +137 ms | 218 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Fixed since scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 567 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 567 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |